Asbestos Lawsuit Highlights Major Health Risks

911 Meso Info

911 Meso Info is a dedicated voice in the fight against mesothelioma, committed to raising awareness, providing reliable information, and empowering individuals affected by this rare disease. With a passion for advocacy, 911 Meso Info delivers insightful resources, up-to-date research, and practical tips to help patients and families navigate their mesothelioma journey. From treatment options and legal guidance to emotional support and prevention strategies, 911 Meso Info is your go-to source for comprehensive mesothelioma knowledge. Connect with us to stay informed and find strength in community. Follow 911 Meso Info for trusted advice and support, and join us in spreading awareness for a brighter tomorrow.

News Summary

Joseph B. Hunter, Jr. and his spouse Claire have filed a lawsuit against several companies, including American Biltrite and General Electric, over asbestos-related health risks following Mr. Hunter’s diagnosis of mesothelioma. The lawsuit claims negligence and seeks accountability for the companies’ actions that exposed workers to hazardous asbestos products. This case is part of a broader trend highlighting the ongoing battle against asbestos-related diseases among workers in various industries.

Another Mesothelioma Lawsuit Spotlighting Asbestos-Related Dangers

In a significant legal action last month, Joseph B. Hunter, Jr. and his spouse Claire have initiated a personal injury lawsuit named after Mr. Hunter’s devastating diagnosis of mesothelioma. The claim casts a wide net, bringing allegations against numerous companies including the likes of American Biltrite, Carrier Corporation, General Electric, and Kaiser Gypsum. The couple asserts that these companies acted in a negligent and careless manner by manufacturing, selling, or distributing products containing asbestos, despite being fully aware of the associated health risks.

Asbestos Exposure Through Various Professions

The lawsuit outlines that Mr. Hunter’s mesothelioma can be traced back to two distinct periods in his work history. From 1964 to 1980, he was employed at Todd Shipyard in San Pedro, California, an environment notably rife with asbestos. His responsibilities included working alongside others engaged in handling materials and products laced with this hazardous substance.

In addition, during the early 1970s, Hunter took on a role as an electrician involved in a myriad of construction sites spread across Southern California. In both these jobs, the couple argues, the exposure to asbestos was formidable. The lawsuit underscores that the first half of his career was entrenched in a shipyard heavily contaminated by asbestos and the latter part entailed working with HVAC systems, notably laden with asbestos-containing components.

Legal Claims and Company Responses

The Hunters’ lawsuit includes several causes of action against the implicated companies, encompassing areas such as negligence, strict liability, negligent misrepresentation, fraud by non-disclosure, and loss of consortium. This points to a comprehensive approach in seeking justice for the ills inflicted upon Mr. Hunter due to his industrial exposure.

In a twist to the proceedings, Greene Tweed, one of the companies named in the suit, has sought to remove the case to federal court. This request stems from the company’s status as a government contractor, specifically in relation to providing parts that adhered to U.S. Navy specifications. Consequently, the Hunters and Greene Tweed are now awaiting the court’s decision to determine whether the case will maintain its course in state or shift to federal jurisdiction.

The Ongoing Battle Against Asbestos-Related Diseases

This lawsuit mirrors a larger trend of individuals fighting back against corporations that fail to acknowledge the dangers associated with asbestos. Millions of construction workers, shipbuilders, and electricians have faced similar predicaments, as mesothelioma cases surge among those with historical exposure to asbestos.

Mesothelioma, a particularly aggressive form of cancer affecting the lining of the lungs and other organs, has often been directly linked to such exposure, leading to substantial legal battles. The Hunters’ case illustrates the ongoing need for accountability within industries that have both knowingly and unknowingly sold hazardous products to workers.

If you find yourself or a loved one battling mesothelioma due to occupational exposure to asbestos, resources are available. Industry experts and Patient Advocates at specialized organizations are prepared to assist those in need, ensuring individuals receive the attention and care they deserve.

The results of the Hunters’ lawsuit could serve as a landmark case for future victims of asbestos exposure, drawing attention to the persistent challenges surrounding this silent killer and holding those at fault accountable for their negligence.