News Summary
A Portland jury has awarded $34.2 million to Richard Long, a former shipyard worker diagnosed with mesothelioma. The case against John Crane Inc. highlights the company’s negligence regarding asbestos-laden products and its devastating impact on workers. Evidence revealed that the corporation was aware of the risks posed by asbestos yet failed to take necessary precautions, prolonging the exposure of workers like Long. This case marks a significant milestone in addressing the urgent issue of asbestos exposure and holding corporations accountable.
Portland Jury Delivers Staggering $34.2 Million Verdict in Mesothelioma Case Involving Shipyard Worker
A Portland jury has held John Crane Inc. accountable for producing hazardous products, awarding $34.2 million to 71-year-old Richard Long, a former shipyard laborer diagnosed with mesothelioma. The case unveils a tragic narrative of suffering and corporate negligence concerning the use of asbestos-laden gaskets and packing.
Richard Long: A Lifetime of Service Cut Short
Richard Long spent his career in the demanding environment of the Dillingham ship repair yard on Swan Island from 1972 until 1985, working as a proud member of Laborers Union Local 296. His dedication and hard work masked a growing health crisis stemming from the frequent use of John Crane’s products, which were known to contain deadly asbestos.
Long’s world shifted dramatically when he was diagnosed in 2023 with biphasic pleural mesothelioma, a particularly aggressive and incurable form of cancer. Prior to his diagnosis, he was thriving in retirement, enjoying outdoor activities with his partner, Peggy.
The Case Unfolds: Evidence of Negligence
The jury’s decision serves not only as a financial judgment but also as a stark reminder of the ongoing impact of asbestos exposure. Evidence presented at trial indicated that John Crane had knowledge of the risks associated with asbestos dating back to the 1930s. By the early 1970s, it was clear that the harmful consequences of their products should have prompted stringent safety measures.
Yet, testimony revealed that the corporation conducted no significant testing to assess the risks posed by their asbestos-containing products before Long’s time as an employee. Internal company communications and material safety data sheets highlighted the cancer risk associated with asbestos, but this critical information was never disclosed to workers like Long.
Corporate Responsibility Under Fire
During the trial, a corporate representative for John Crane acknowledged the company’s responsibility to provide safe products but maintained that their asbestos items were harmless. However, a major turning point came when the company only began issuing warnings about asbestos in 1983, decades too late for Long and many others who had already been exposed.
This case marks the second trial following a mistrial in June 2023 after four days of jury deliberations. The successful outcome reflects a broader societal reckoning with the tragic legacy of asbestos exposure, particularly in industries that relied heavily on its use, such as shipbuilding.
Expert Testimony and Legal Advocacy
The trial saw the involvement of highly qualified expert witnesses who illuminated the dangers of asbestos exposure and the scientific consensus regarding its health risks. Medical professionals and experts in occupational safety presented compelling evidence demonstrating a clear link between John Crane’s products and the devastating diagnosis faced by Long.
The legal team behind the case included professionals from Dean Omar Branham Shirley, LLP, alongside Devin Robinson from Devin Robinson P.C. Together, they navigated the intricate and challenging landscape of asbestos litigation to achieve this significant verdict.
A Fight for Justice
As the case, officially named Richard D. Long v. 3M Company et al., sits within the Circuit Court of the State of Oregon for the County of Multnomah, it underscores the urgency of addressing the long-neglected issue of asbestos exposure. The significant verdict not only recognizes the pain and suffering endured by those affected but also aims to hold corporations accountable for their part in these tragedies.
The verdict serves as a rallying cry for individuals and families grappling with the devastating impacts of asbestos-related diseases, reflecting a hope for justice and change. It shines a light on the importance of vigilance, safety, and accountability in industries that continue to carry the legacy of harmful materials.
Deeper Dive: News & Info About This Topic
HERE Resources
Wisconsin Supreme Court Evaluates Pabst Brewing’s Liability in Mesothelioma Case
Demolition Worker Diagnosed with Mesothelioma Seeks Justice
Family Struggling for Answers as Mesothelioma Claims Life of Leeds Woman
Breakthrough in Mesothelioma Research: Targeting YB-1
Whistleblower Exposes Asbestos Scandal at Springfield Properties
Inquest Opens on Rise of Asbestos-Linked Deaths in Suffolk
Asbestos Scare Shuts Down Torrance Post Office
September Marks Mesothelioma Awareness Month: A Call to Action
Tragic Mesothelioma Diagnosis Claims Life of Hampshire Man
New Hope for Asbestos Victims: Court Ruling Allows 13 Lawsuits to Proceed
Additional Resources
- Business Wire: Portland Jury Holds John Crane Inc. Liable in $34.2M Mesothelioma Verdict
- Wikipedia: Mesothelioma
- Reuters: J&J Must Pay $260 Million in Latest Talc Trial
- Google Search: mesothelioma asbestos exposure
- Fierce Pharma: Oregon Jury Says Johnson & Johnson Must Pay $260M
- Google Scholar: asbestos mesothelioma litigation
- Encyclopedia Britannica: Asbestos
- Google News: asbestos lawsuit

















